The Franciscans
established San Fernando on May 14, 1769, only two years following the
establishment of Santa Maria de los Angeles, the last Jesuit
establishment,[i]
further to the south. Eventually, the missionaries suppressed Santa
Maria, and moved the population of that marginal establishment to the
jurisdiction of San Fernando. The Jesuits had identified the Velicata
site as a potential location for a new mission because of the large
indigenous population in the area, and the availability of water for
agriculture.
The Building of San Fernando Mission
There are relatively
few details regarding the construction of San Fernando mission. The first
description of the mission casco comes
from the 1773 inventory prepared when the Franciscans passed jurisdiction of
the mission to the Dominicans. The inventory described the church as a new
adobe structure built of adobe with a roof of tule and packed earth. The
church measured 16 x 7 varas.
There was also a new residence for the missionaries built in the same
fashion as the church with dimensions of 22 ˝ x 8 varas. There
was also an adobe granary.[ii]
The church reported in
1773 had either been enlarged or replaced by a larger structure by the early
1790s. A 1793 report described the church as being of adobe and poles, and
measuring 33 x 5 ˝ varas (see Table 2.1). Annual reports from 1797 and 1798
noted construction at the mission. In 1797, the Dominicans directed the
construction of twoadobe and xacal structures at San Fernando. In the
following year the missionaries reported the addition of an adobe structure
16 x 7varas to
the mission casco. The
reports did not always indicate the use of the buildings, although the one
built in 1798 was used for storage.[iii]
In the early 1920s,
historical geographers Carl Sauer and Peveril Meigs studied San Fernando
mission, The mission church and associated buildings occupied a terrace up
against a steep hillside just above the arroyo floor, presumably safe from
possible flood damage. The adobe church obviously was the largest structure,
and Sauer and Meigs located foundations for other buildings. In terms of the
configuration of the mission casco,
San Fernando more closely resembled missions further south with buildings
erected around the church but not in the form of a quadrangle or with
defensive walls as was the case in the Texas and California missions.
Mission
Economy
The economy of San
Fernando mission was similar to that of Comondu, based on ranching and
farming. The missionaries also operated several visitas that
were centers of farming and ranching.One important visita with
improvements that included buildings was San Juan de Dios.[iv]
A reference to a second appears in the 1773 inventory of the mission. The
inventory describes the visita as
being located about 1 ˝ leagues from the mission in a plain. A corral had
been built for livestock, and obviously the site was a ranch for livestock.[v]
Ranching appears to have been conducted on a small scale because of the
limited pasture in the arid region. Numbers of cattle never passed around
200, and the flock of sheep and herds of horses were also small (see Table
4.1).
Agriculture was the
mainstay of the mission economy, although in most years local grain
production did not supply the needs of the bulk of the neophyte population.
The Franciscans built an irrigation system that drew upon the stream that
runs through the narrow arroyo where the missions is located. In his 1771
report Francisco Palou, O.F.M., noted that:
It [San Fernando] is
situated in a valley through whose center runs a stream of water of some
abundance sufficient to irrigate the land which the valley contains, and
they easily succeeded by means of a dam of earth and stone to collect the
water.The Father soon set tow ork cultivating the land in order that he
might have wherewith to feed the pagans to win them to God…It has been
discovered that the land is very salinous, wherefore it does not yield corn
and wheat abundantly; much of it generally spoils. ..They have begun to
plant fruit-trees, cotton, and vines; but they have produced nothing,
because the saltpeter withers the plants.[vi]
Despite the poor early
prognosis, the Franciscans and later the Dominicans did direct the
production of some large crops (see Table 4.2). The largest wheat crop on
record was 800 fanegas, 400
for corn, and 300 for barley.
Demographic
Patterns at San Fernando
Baptismal and burial
registers survive for most of the early period of the existence of the
mission, and provide important insights to the process of congregation and
demographic patterns. The missionaries baptized the vast majority of the
indigenous population within a decade. By 1779, the Franciscans and
Dominicans baptized 96 percent of all gentiles converted at the mission.[vii]
However, the actual process of conversion probably took longer, since large
numbers of neophytes lived at satellite villages because of the limited
agricultural potential at Velicata, the site of the mission. The population
reached a recorded high of 1,406 in 1775, but then declined over the next
half-century. The population stood at 363 in 1800, 155 in 1808, and in 1829
only 19 people continued to live at the mission (see Figure 4.1).[viii]
The indigenous
population of San Fernando also experienced extremely high mortality rates
over the first ten to fifteen years, as epidemics swept across the land. In
the 1774-1778 quinquennium alone some 30 percent of the population died, and
death rates continued quite high until after the 1781-1782 smallpox epidemic
(figure 4.2). Another series of epidemic pretty much finished off the
indigenous population. Even in non-epidemic years death rates were higher
than birth rates, and mean life expectancy at birth was low. On average
children born at the mission lived only 4.7 years, and during the severe
epidemics live expectancy was even lower (see Table 4.3).
Periodic epidemics
devastated the population of San Fernando mission, as to did chronic
ailments such as syphilis and respiratory ailments. Scholars have pointed to
a pattern of season mortality, with higher death rates during the colder
months when people generally spent more time indoors which facilitated the
spread of contagious diseases. It was also a period when the old, young, and
infirm succumbed to a combination of maladies. Deaths at San Fernando
clearly fits the pattern of seasonal mortality, In percentages the largest
numbers of burials occurred in the winter (December to February) and spring
(March to May), with 27.1 percent and 27.5 percent respectively.[ix]
This pattern was similar to several neighboring missions along the Pacific
Coast north of San Fernando established by the Dominicans after 1774. A
different pattern can be seen at Comondu, with higher mortality in the fall
(September to November) and spring (March to May), with 27.1 percent and
29.2 percent respectively.[x]
The pattern of age and
gender imbalance discussed above for Comondu mission does not completely
apply to the indigenous population of San Fernando, although signs of
imbalance already appeared at the end of the eighteenth and in the early
nineteenth centuries. Comondu had already existed for six decades when the
Franciscans established San Fernando, and therefore the process of
demographic collapse was already more advanced. Young children under age
nine (parvulos)
constituted between 18 and 24 percent of the population of San Fernando in
the years 1795 to 1798.[xi]
While this was still higher than at Comondu in the same years, it still
showed a trend towards more imbalances resulting from dropping birth rates
and high mortality rates among children. In terms of the sex ratio, the
population of San Fernando already evidenced gender imbalances with more
males than females.[xii]
The population of San Fernando was well on its way to near extinction, and
only 19 people remained at the mission in 1829.
Table 4.1: Livestock Reported at San
Fernando Mission
|
Year |
Cattle |
Sheep |
Horses |
|
1769
|
|
|
|
|
1770
|
|
|
|
|
1771
|
49
|
40
|
12
|
|
1772
|
|
|
|
|
1773
|
75
|
71
|
12
|
|
1774
|
75
|
55
|
11
|
|
1775
|
79
|
98
|
24
|
|
1776
|
107
|
186
|
30
|
|
1777
|
|
|
|
|
1778
|
|
|
|
|
1779
|
|
|
|
|
1780
|
114
|
227
|
34
|
|
1781
|
|
|
|
|
1782
|
110
|
178
|
12
|
|
1783
|
120
|
|
|
|
1784
|
152
|
310
|
12
|
|
1785
|
113
|
287
|
12
|
|
1786
|
107
|
279
|
10
|
|
1787
|
88
|
130
|
12
|
|
1788
|
38
|
189
|
10
|
|
1789
|
|
|
|
|
1790
|
|
|
|
|
1791
|
|
|
|
|
1792
|
|
|
|
|
1793
|
113
|
202
|
31
|
|
1794
|
77
|
100
|
28
|
|
1795
|
100
|
60
|
28
|
|
1796
|
101
|
150
|
12
|
|
1797
|
67
|
140
|
38
|
|
1798
|
70
|
|
|
|
1799
|
60
|
128
|
52
|
|
1800
|
110
|
103
|
54
|
|
1801
|
170
|
60
|
54
|
|
1802
|
|
|
|
|
1803
|
160
|
54
|
58
|
|
1804
|
|
|
|
|
1805
|
100
|
120
|
39
|
Source: Annual Reports, Archivo General de la Nacion, Mexico, D.F.; Homer Aschmann, The Central Desert of Baja California: Demography and Ecology (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1959).
Table 4.2: Grain Production at San
Fernando Mission
|
Year |
Wheat |
Corn |
Barley |
|
1769
|
|
|
|
|
1770
|
|
|
|
|
1771
|
200
|
|
|
|
1772
|
|
|
|
|
1773
|
107
|
|
26
|
|
1774
|
|
|
|
|
1775
|
100
|
|
|
|
1776
|
200
|
|
300
|
|
1777
|
|
|
|
|
1778
|
|
|
|
|
1779
|
|
|
|
|
1780
|
|
|
|
|
1781
|
|
|
|
|
1782
|
338
|
410
|
107
|
|
1783
|
|
|
|
|
1784
|
700
|
260
|
|
|
1785
|
950
|
140
|
|
|
1786
|
940
|
120
|
|
|
1787
|
400
|
130
|
|
|
1788
|
29
|
70
|
|
|
1789
|
|
|
|
|
1790
|
|
|
|
|
1791
|
|
|
|
|
1792
|
|
|
|
|
1793
|
767
|
|
|
|
1794
|
515
|
104
|
|
|
1795
|
500
|
200
|
|
|
1796
|
493
|
100
|
|
|
1797
|
300
|
130
|
|
|
1798
|
800
|
150
|
30
|
|
1799
|
380
|
1
|
6
|
|
1800
|
450
|
80
|
130
|
|
1801
|
200
|
60
|
12
|
|
1802
|
|
|
|
|
1803
|
500
|
40
|
12
|
|
1804
|
|
|
|
|
1805
|
700
|
90
|
21
|
Source: Annual Reports, Archivo General de la Nacion, Mexico, D.F Homer Aschmann, The Central Desert of Baja California: Demography and Ecology (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1959).
Table 4.3: San Fernando
Mission Demographic Statistics
|
Quinquennium |
Mid-point |
Birth Rate |
Death Rate |
Life Expec. |
|
1774-1778 |
1,216 |
69 |
301 |
.5 |
|
1779-1783 |
792 |
39 |
110 |
1.2 |
|
1784-1788 |
559 |
50 |
76 |
7.2 |
|
1789-1793 |
506 |
39 |
52 |
16.1 |
|
1794-1798 |
452 |
20 |
55 |
11.9 |
|
1799-1803 |
313 |
15 |
116 |
1.2 |
|
1804-1808 |
201 |
14 |
115 |
1.2 |
|
1809-1813 |
128 |
27 |
103 |
1.6 |
|
1814-1818 |
87 |
5 |
90 |
1.6 |
Source: Robert H. Jackson, Indian Population Decline: The Missions of Northwestern New Spain, 1687-1840 (Albuquerque, 1994), 79.
[i] Zephyrin Engelhardt,O.F.M.,Missions
and Missionaries of California: Lower California (Santa
Barbara, 1929), 491.
[ii]Vicente
Fuster, O.F.M., Miguel Hidalgo, O.P., and Pedro Gandiaga, O.P.,
“Entrega de la Mision de S[a]n Fernando de Velicata,” AGN, Misiones
12.
[iii]San
Fernando Mission annual reports, 1797 and 1798, in AGN Misiones 3.
[iv]Aguilar
Marco, Misiones, 111.
[v]Fuster,
Hidalgo, and Gandiaga, “Entrega.”
[vi]Engelhardt,
Missions and Missionaries,492-493.
[vii]San
Fernando MissionBaptismal and Burial Registers, St. Albert’s
College, Oakland, California.
[viii]Jackson,
Indian Population Decline, 109-112.
[ix]Ibid.,
122-125.
[x]Ibid.
[xi]Ibid.,112.
[xii]Ibid.,
113.